Decision 01
Sharpen positioning
See which buyer segments and priorities already align with the product, and where the answer becomes ambiguous.
Independent AI recommendation benchmarks
Measure which products enter AI shortlists, which one becomes the first choice, how the answer changes by buyer, and what sources shape the result. Starting with CRM.
Current public evidence: 600 accepted answers across 200 US CRM buyer prompts and three waves · observed September 8, 2026–September 14, 2026
Exhibit A · US CRMPublished replication
HubSpot led recommendation reach. Salesforce narrowly led first choice.
| CRM product | Recommended | First choice |
|---|---|---|
| HubSpot CRM | 86.3% | 23.5% |
| Salesforce Sales Cloud | 59.8% | 24.9% |
Recommendation uses 600 accepted answers; first choice uses 591 determinate answers. Explicit co-leaders split first-choice credit. Bars share a 0–100% scale.
September 8, 2026–September 14, 2026 · OpenAI Responses API · gpt-5.6-luna
200 prompts repeated in three waves; exploratory findings. Method crm-replication-2026-09-v1.
Read the findings and limitations →The CRM market answer
The three-wave CRM replication found a broad leader, but recommendation reach and first choice diverged, while buying priorities still changed the winner. Benchmark Bureau maps those conditions instead of compressing them into one universal rank.
Each slice contains 120 accepted answers from 40 prompts repeated in three waves. Estimates describe answer behavior, not product quality or buyer conversion.
What we measure
AI visibility becomes more useful when each narrowing step is measured separately. The hierarchy shows whether a brand was merely named, seriously considered, actively recommended, or selected first.
Signal 1 of 4
Did the product appear in the answer at all?
Signal 2 of 4
Did it enter the set the buyer was asked to consider?
Signal 3 of 4
Did the answer actively recommend it?
Signal 4 of 4
Was it the explicit leader after co-leaders were split?
Rates count eligible answers. Several products can appear in one answer, so product recommendation rates may sum above 100%. Every release states its denominator, configuration, and observation window.
Why recurrence matters
A credible market signal needs to show what persisted, what changed, and what remains uncertain. The September release repeats the same 200 prompts across three timed waves and reports matched changes from August.
Current release · September 2026
Recommendation and first-choice uncertainty, buyer context, sources, historical change, and wave stability.
Open the dated release →Baseline · August 2026
The matched starting point for measuring what changed and what persisted.
Open the August release →Gated next step
Added only after matched configuration and customer-decision value are established.
For CRM teams
Benchmark Bureau is designed for product marketing, competitive intelligence, brand, growth, and leadership teams that need evidence, not a promise to manipulate a ranking.
Decision 01
See which buyer segments and priorities already align with the product, and where the answer becomes ambiguous.
Decision 02
Measure which competitors appear in the same consideration sets instead of watching isolated brand mentions.
Decision 03
Separate broad recommendation reach from the prompts where another product becomes the explicit leader.
Decision 04
Inspect the source domains and evidence patterns present when a market answer is assembled.
Decision 05
Bring a dated, scoped, downloadable market signal into planning without presenting anecdotes as market share.
Why trust it
Prompts, model configuration, dates, denominators, scoring rules, and limitations remain beside every finding.
Commercial work cannot change inclusion, prompts, scoring, findings, or rank.
Public reports link to HTML tables, exact scope, and downloadable data rather than unsupported scorecards.
A single provider, small segment, unstable result, or missing comparison is labeled instead of generalized away.
Public record
Interactive decision view
Select a product, competitor, company scale, and buying priority to build a shareable evidence snapshot.
Build a decision view →Dataset
Six public files with product, segment, prompt, source, and event data.
Open the dataset record →Research archive
The founding study demonstrates the method in a location-sensitive market.
Open the archived study →Follow the evidence
Follow the public release feed for new benchmark records, or request a simple email notice when a material CRM release is published. No newsletter list is implied.
CRM AI recommendation intelligence
See where your product enters the market answer, where it loses first choice, and what evidence surrounds the decision.
Private work never changes public inclusion, scoring, or rank.